<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Instagram</title>
	<link>http://www.hairysocialistsforcatlovers.com/2011/03/11/instagram/?source=rss</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 21:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.hairysocialistsforcatlovers.com/2011/03/11/instagram/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hairysocialistsforcatlovers.com/2011/03/11/instagram/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>My point, though, is that the *vast* majority of users
a) upload crap/boring photos
b) apply effects to said photos that they think make them look really cool.

Equally, if someone takes a nice shot of something (a landscape, a landmark, etc) then shares it but with a ridiculous "film" effect, I just think bah, I'd actually quite liked to have seen WHAT WAS THERE, not what was there shoved through a hue filter to make everything red.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point, though, is that the *vast* majority of users<br />
a) upload crap/boring photos<br />
b) apply effects to said photos that they think make them look really cool.</p>
<p>Equally, if someone takes a nice shot of something (a landscape, a landmark, etc) then shares it but with a ridiculous &#8220;film&#8221; effect, I just think bah, I&#8217;d actually quite liked to have seen WHAT WAS THERE, not what was there shoved through a hue filter to make everything red.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.hairysocialistsforcatlovers.com/2011/03/11/instagram/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hairysocialistsforcatlovers.com/2011/03/11/instagram/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I think you're being a little bit *grumpy* ;)

It's true that a filter cannot improve a crap photo...but it is also true that, in the hands of someone who understands composition/light/shadow/texture/framing etc, the results can be powerful. I'm not saying that's me (by a long shot) but, at the end of the day, it's just a too and only as capable as the user.

Also I think we miss an important point by dismissing Instagram; the true beauty is bugger all to do with effects (you can just as easily upload your photo sans effect). The beauty is the one-click-sharing across multiple social networks - no other iPhone camera app does it anywhere near as fluidly.

@Joel_Hughes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re being a little bit *grumpy* ;)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that a filter cannot improve a crap photo&#8230;but it is also true that, in the hands of someone who understands composition/light/shadow/texture/framing etc, the results can be powerful. I&#8217;m not saying that&#8217;s me (by a long shot) but, at the end of the day, it&#8217;s just a too and only as capable as the user.</p>
<p>Also I think we miss an important point by dismissing Instagram; the true beauty is bugger all to do with effects (you can just as easily upload your photo sans effect). The beauty is the one-click-sharing across multiple social networks - no other iPhone camera app does it anywhere near as fluidly.</p>
<p>@Joel_Hughes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

